5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bello.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bello Anchor | green | “limited to 'whether the facts, if proven, and the inferences that logically flow from those facts supply proof of every element of the charged crimes,' and whether 'the grand jury could rationally have drawn the guilty inference” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Valles | green | “a grand jury need not be instructed with the same degree of precision that is required when a petit jury is instructed on the law” | 7 |
| 3 | People v. . Molineux | green | “seek to introduce defendant's prior bad acts on their direct case pursuant to people v molineux, 168 ny 264 1901, the people will inform defense counsel and the court and request a hearing before introducing such molineux evidence” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Grant | green | “in the context of a grand jury proceeding, legal sufficiency means prima facie proof of the crimes charged, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt” | 5 |
| 5 | The People v. Benny Garay | green | “the ground or grounds of the motion and must contain sworn allegations of fact” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.