4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd. Anchor | green | “a material fact exists where a buyer would have acted differently knowing the information, or if it concerned the type of information upon which a buyer would be expected to rely in making a decision whether to purchase.” | 15 |
| 2 | Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co. | green | “to properly plead the element of proximate causation in a private cause of action for deceptive advertising brought under the act, a plaintiff must allege that he was, in some manner, deceived.” | 5 |
| 3 | Munjal v. Baird & Warner, Inc. | green | “without the allegedly deceptive advertising, the defendant would not have been in the siding business, because there would have been no market for its siding.” | 4 |
| 4 | Holton v. Memorial Hospital | green | “the only cause, nor the last or nearest cause.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.