7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Conservatorship of Stevenson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Conservatorship of Stevenson Anchor | green | “substantially all of plaintiffs' material allegations,” | 4 |
| 2 | Moore v. Centreville Township Hospital | green | “as a result of an examination by a physician, employed by an opponent, solely for the purpose of rendering a medical-legal opinion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Moore v. Centreville Township Hospital | green | “as a result of an examination by a physician, employed by an opponent, solely for the purpose of rendering a medical-legal opinion.” | 4 |
| 4 | In re Marriage of Pratt | green | “conflicting medical testimony, reports, or other documentation offered as proof” | 4 |
| 5 | Kaull v. Kaull | green | “although a 'good cause' requirement has been eliminated from rule 215, physical and mental examinations, like all of our discovery devices, require that trial courts carefully exercise their discretion.” | 4 |
| 6 | Bank of America v. Freed | green | “will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence or the record reflects an abuse of discretion.” | 4 |
| 7 | In re Marriage of Winter | green | “preclude him from having to undergo the test.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.