5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bradley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bradley Anchor | green | “whether the statute is reasonably designed to remedy the evils which the legislature has determined to be a threat to the public health, safety and general welfare.” | 15 |
| 2 | People v. Bradley | green | “reasonably designed to remedy the evils which the legislature has determined to be a threat to the public health, safety and general welfare.” | 4 |
| 3 | Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University v. Department of Human Rights | green | “the amendment was intended to change the law.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Tolliver | green | “protecting otherwise innocent conduct from criminal prosecution” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Nunn | green | “the omission or addition of words in a new statute does not necessarily indicate a legislative intent to change the effect of the earlier statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.