7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lioce v. Cohen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lioce v. Cohen Anchor | green | “an attorney's statements of personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, or the culpability of a litigant is. . . improper in civil cases and may amount to prejudicial misconduct necessitating a new trial.” | 4 |
| 2 | Higgs v. State | green | “nrs 50.275 is the blueprint for the admissibility of expert witness testimony” | 4 |
| 3 | Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc. | green | “plaintiff carries the burden of proving, in part, that the inadequate warning caused his injuries.” | 4 |
| 4 | Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc. | green | “as determined by their context” | 4 |
| 5 | Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc. | green | “assume that the jury believed all of the evidence favorable to” | 4 |
| 6 | Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc. | green | “credibility determinations and the weighing of evidence are left to the trier of fact.” | 4 |
| 7 | Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt | neutral | “merely allows the fact-finder to determine, based on other evidence, that a fact exists.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.