3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re VV.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re VV Anchor | green | “intentional criminal activity that exposes a parent to incarceration is conduct that endangers the physical and emotional well-being of a child.” | 14 |
| 2 | in the Interest of N.J.H., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services | green | “because it significantly harms the parenting relationship, drug activity can constitute endangerment even if it transpires outside the child's presence.” | 8 |
| 3 | in the Interest of N.J.H., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services | green | “decision to engage in illegal drug use during the pendency of a termination suit, when the parent is at risk of losing a child, may support a finding that the parent engaged in conduct that endangered the child's physical or emotional well-being.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.