4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Wyeth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Wyeth Anchor | green | “the court believes that the magistrate judge in this case was within the authority granted him by 636(b)(1)(a) to order remand as long as an opportunity was provided for any party to seek a rule 72 review of the order.” | 8 |
| 2 | South Florida Wellness, Inc. v. AllState Insurance Company | green | “the defendant seeking removal must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum.” | 7 |
| 3 | Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc. | green | “the terms 'dispositive' or 'nondispositive' in rule 72 do not create categories separate from the statute which rule 72 implements.” | 7 |
| 4 | Johnson v. Wyeth | green | “why should the district judge be involved at all if no party timely objects to the order of remand?” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.