3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo Anchor | green | “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 13 |
| 2 | United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo | green | “after viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 10 |
| 3 | United States v. Paul Suarez | green | “substantial deference to the jury verdict.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.