7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kelvion, Inc. v. PetroChina Canada Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelvion, Inc. v. PetroChina Canada Ltd. Anchor | green | “a forum-selection clause will apply to claims that ultimately depend on the existence of a contractual relationship between the parties; where resolution of the claims relates to interpretation of the contract; or when the claims involve the same operative facts as a parallel cl…” | 4 |
| 2 | Kelvion, Inc. v. PetroChina Canada Ltd. | green | “a plaintiff cannot defeat a forum- selection clause by its choice of provisions to sue on, of legal theories to press, and of defendants to name in the suit.” | 4 |
| 3 | Farhad Azima v. Rak Investment Authority | green | “are not based on the 2016 agreement and do 86 see azima, 926 f.3d at 875 . 87 dkt. 42 at 7. 88 see jacks, 856 f.3d at 1304-05 (noting the "basic principle of contract law” | 4 |
| 4 | Presbyterian Healthcare Services v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. | green | “efficiency interests in avoiding duplicative litigation.” | 4 |
| 5 | Presidential Hospitality, LLC v. Wyndham Hotel Grp., LLC | green | “considers in sequence: (1) the forum-selection clause, (2) the private and public interests relevant to non-contracting parties, (3) threshold issues related to severance, and (4) which transfer decision most promotes efficiency while minimizing prejudice to non-contracting part…” | 4 |
| 6 | Presidential Hospitality, LLC v. Wyndham Hotel Grp., LLC | green | “it remains unclear what law would govern whether a non-signatory is bound to a forum-selection clause in a diversity action or for supplemental state-law claims like those at issue here.” | 4 |
| 7 | Presidential Hospitality, LLC v. Wyndham Hotel Grp., LLC | green | “the tenth circuit has never considered whether a forum selection clause can bind a non-party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.