5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matter of Balbuenas v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matter of Balbuenas v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. Anchor | green | “the presence or absence of any one of these factors is not dispositive” | 9 |
| 2 | Williams v. Nassau County Medical Center | green | “evince that the medical staff, by its acts or omissions, inflicted an injury on plaintiff” | 6 |
| 3 | Newcomb v. Middle Country Central School District | green | “some evidence or plausible argument that supports a finding of no substantial prejudice” | 6 |
| 4 | Matter of Ibrahim v. New York City Tr. Auth. | green | “the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality or public corporation in its defense” | 5 |
| 5 | Matter of Shumway v. Town of Hempstead | green | “some evidence or plausible argument that supports a finding of no substantial prejudice” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.