3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc. Anchor | green | “judgment on the pleadings is appropriate when there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 18 |
| 2 | Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc. | green | “when there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 5 |
| 3 | Mergens v. Dreyfoos | green | “when reviewing judgment on the pleadings, we must take the facts alleged in the complaint as true and view them in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.