Topic: because the mandatory consultation and twenty-four hour del… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1433

7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice Anchor
miss · 1998
green “because the mandatory consultation and twenty-four hour delay ensures that a woman has given thoughtful consideration in deciding whether to obtain an abortion, does not create an undue burden and is therefore constitutional.” 3
2 Callender v. Skiles
iowa · 1999
green “we have repeatedly found fundamental interests in family and parenting circumstances.” 3
3 State v. Seering
iowa · 2005
green “he familial relationship is a fundamental liberty interest protected by both constitutions.” 3
4 Olds v. Olds
iowa · 1984
green “he government is ill-equipped to dictate the details of social interaction among family members. . . . he parenting right is a fundamental liberty interest that is protected against unwarranted state intrusion.” 3
5 Eubanks v. Schmidt
kywd · 2000
green “simply put, the twenty-four hour informed consent period makes abortions marginally more difficult to obtain, but . . . it does not fundamentally alter any of the significant preexisting burdens facing poor women who are distant from abortion providers.” 3
6 In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Stuart Kennedy (Involuntary) Stuart Kennedy v. Maria Kennedy
iowa · 2014
green “a statutory scheme that empowered a court-appointed actor . . . to have an intellectually disabled person sterilized without some form of judicial review would raise serious due process concerns.” 3
7 Karen McQuistion v. City of Clinton, Iowa Mark Regenwether Jeffrey Farwell And Jeffrey Horne
iowa · 2015
green “the right to procreate is implied in the concept of ordered liberty and qualifies for due process protection as a fundamental right.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check