3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy Anchor | green | “it is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by law, to review the determination of the political branch of the government to exclude a given alien.” | 17 |
| 2 | Roberto Saavedra Bruno,appellants v. Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State,appellees | green | “consular visa determinations are not subject to judicial review.” | 6 |
| 3 | Adrian Da Costa v. Immigration Investor Program Office | green | “moving the plaintiffs' petitions to the front of the line would disrupt competing agency priorities with no overall improvement in the uscis backlog.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.