3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from May v. Segovia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | May v. Segovia Anchor | green | “although a defendant bears the burden of 'proving that the plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies,' once the defendant has carried that burden, 'the onus falls on the plaintiff to show that remedies were unavailable to him.” | 12 |
| 2 | Tuckel v. Grover | green | “where prison officials prevent, thwart, or hinder a prisoner's efforts to avail himself of an administrative remedy,” | 8 |
| 3 | Thomas v. Parker | green | “an inmate who begins the grievance process but does not complete it is barred from pursuing a 1983 claim or any other federal claim under the plra for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies,” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.