3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from New Mexicans For Bill Richardson v. Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Mexicans For Bill Richardson v. Gonzales Anchor | green | “alleging facts demonstrating the appropriateness of invoking judicial resolution of the dispute.” | 10 |
| 2 | Merida Delgado v. Gonzales | green | “the courts' statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate the case” | 9 |
| 3 | Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co. | green | “insofar as subject matter jurisdiction is concerned, it has long been recognized that a federal court must, sua sponte, satisfy itself of its power to adjudicate in every case and at every stage of the proceedings and the court is not bound by the acts or pleadings of the partie…” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.