Topic: will not be extended beyond its plain meaning or applied to… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #14432

8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Satterfield v. Satterfield.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Satterfield v. Satterfield Anchor
tex · 1969
green “will not be extended beyond its plain meaning or applied to cases not clearly within its purview.” 4
2 Satterfield v. Satterfield
tex · 1969
green “while texas follows the rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are not to be strictly construed, it is recognized that if a statute creates a liability unknown to the common law, or deprives a person of a common law right, the statute will be strictly construed in th…” 4
3 Mut. Pharm. Co. v. Bartlett
scotus · 2013
green “our pre-emption cases presume that an actor seeking to satisfy both his federal- and state-law obligations is not required to cease acting altogether in order to avoid liability.” 4
4 Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago Transit Authority
ca7 · 2011
green “even if the property was not being used and union pacific had no immediate plans to use this property, a taking of this property would still prevent union pacific from using it for railroad transportation in the future” 3
5 Adrian & Blissfield Railroad v. Village of Blissfield
ca6 · 2008
green “state law actions can be preempted as applied if they have the effect of unreasonably burdening or interfering with rail transportation,” 3
6 Adrian & Blissfield Railroad v. Village of Blissfield
ca6 · 2008
green “unreasonably burdensome and did not discriminate against railroads” 3
7 Tubbs v. Surface Transportation Board
ca8 · 2015
green “subject construction of elevated railroad embankments to state regulation . . . via negligence” 3
8 Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs.
scotus · 2021
green “breathtaking amount of authority,” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check