5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taylor v. Supreme Ct of NJ.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor v. Supreme Ct of NJ Anchor | green | “a person need not be 'absolutely destitute' to proceed ifp; however, an affiant must show the inability to pay the filing and docketing fees.” | 6 |
| 2 | Taylor v. Supreme Ct of NJ | green | “the decision to grant ifp status turns on whether an applicant is 'economically eligible' for such status.” | 6 |
| 3 | Mcteague v. Sosnowski | green | “tidal wave of frivolous or malicious motions filed by a person who gave no pause before crossing the threshold of the courthouse door,” | 5 |
| 4 | Alejandro Izquierdo v. State of New Jersey | green | “extreme circumstances' may justify denying ifp status to an otherwise eligible applicant.” | 5 |
| 5 | Nina Shahin v. Secretary of State of Delaware | green | “is a privilege rather than a right” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.