7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Crispino v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crispino v. State Anchor | green | “a variance has been defined as a difference between the allegations in a charging instrument and the proof actually introduced at trial.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kpetigo v. Kpetigo | green | “instead, step-parents previously have stood in the same shoes as other non-parental third parties.” | 3 |
| 3 | Nichols v. State | green | “where an appellate court determines that at least one of a defendant's sentences must be vacated, the appellate court may vacate all of the defendant's sentences and remand for resentencing.” | 3 |
| 4 | E.N. v. T.R. | green | “a child's legal parent, i.e., biological or adoptive parent” | 3 |
| 5 | Tapscott v. State | green | “hen the state delineated the particular section of the statute, however, it charged only the conduct and circumstances proscribed by that section.” | 3 |
| 6 | Tapscott v. State | green | “these alternatives are in the disjunctive, setting forth several different classes of people who fall within the proscriptions of the statute.” | 3 |
| 7 | Richardson v. Boozer | green | “a question regarding statutory interpretation is a legal question, which we review de novo.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.