3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United States Anchor | green | “evidence submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be admissible.” | 16 |
| 2 | U.S. Structures, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. J.P. Structures, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, and Joseph J. Pilat | green | “hearsay evidence . . . must be disregarded.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.