2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Hubert Garland Evans.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Hubert Garland Evans Anchor | green | “rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.” | 13 |
| 2 | United States v. Roberson, III | green | “because they raised this argument for the first time in their reply brief, we treat this argument as waived.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.