4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greg Burley v. National Passenger Rail Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greg Burley v. National Passenger Rail Corp. Anchor | green | “factors that bear on whether someone is an appropriate comparator include the similarity of the plaintiff's and the putative comparator's jobs and job duties, whether they were disciplined by the same supervisor, and, in cases involving discipline, the similarity of their offens…” | 11 |
| 2 | Fields v. Office of Johnson | green | “self-serving testimony does not create genuine issues of material fact, especially where that very testimony suggests that corroborating evidence should be readily available.” | 8 |
| 3 | Greg Burley v. National Passenger Rail Corp. | green | “the similarity of the plaintiff's and the putative comparator's jobs and job duties, whether they were disciplined by the same supervisor, and, in cases involving discipline, the similarity of their offenses.” | 6 |
| 4 | Duru v. Dist. of Columbia | green | “whether two employees are similarly situated ordinarily presents a question of fact for the jury, but the court may find that employees are not similarly situated as a matter of law if a reasonable jury would be unable to reach that conclusion.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.