5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Combs v. City of Webster.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Combs v. City of Webster Anchor | green | “to the extent that no rule as defined by the apa is at issue, section 2001.038 does not provide any basis for the district court's jurisdiction over appellees' declaratory judgment action” | 9 |
| 2 | Texas Logos, L.P. v. Texas Department of Transportation | green | “it is alleged that the rule or its threatened application interferes with or impairs, or threatens to interfere with or impair, a legal right or privilege of the plaintiff.” | 6 |
| 3 | Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vista Community Medical Center, LLP | green | “the 2005 staff report did not affect private rights because it did not change or amend” | 4 |
| 4 | Texas Department of Public Safety v. Salazar | green | “agency statements that 'have no effect on private persons' are not considered rules” | 4 |
| 5 | Texas Logos, L.P. v. Texas Department of Transportation | green | “the rule or its threatened application interferes with or impairs, or threatens to interfere with or impair, a legal right or privilege of the plaintiff.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.