Topic: inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence of record whi… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #14706

8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Ouch.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Commonwealth v. Ouch Anchor
pasuperct · 2018
green “inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence of record which would support a verdict of guilty are to be given effect, and the evidence must be read in the light most favorable to the commonwealth's case.” 5
2 Commonwealth v. Mattison
pa · 2013
green “specific intent to kill can be established through circumstantial evidence, such as the use of a deadly weapon on a vital part of the victim's body.” 4
3 Commonwealth v. Calloway
pasuperct · 1983
green “misled the police investigation and to obfuscate his participation in the crime.” 3
4 Commonwealth v. Weigle
pa · 2010
green “under philadelphia county local criminal rule (h), common pleas motions court judges' orders discharging an accused or denying a re-arrest petition constitute final orders subject to appellate review.” 3
5 Commonwealth v. Santos
pa · 2005
green “it is well-established that to convict a defendant of first-degree murder, the commonwealth must show that the defendant killed another person with the specific intent to kill that person and malice aforethought.” 3
6 Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maisenhelder v. Rundle
pa · 1964
green “the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the commonwealth so that inferences that would support a guilty verdict are given effect.” 3
7 Commonwealth v. Ouch
pasuperct · 2018
green “constitutionally infirm unless the inferred fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend.” 3
8 Commonwealth v. Scarborough
pa · 2013
green “as a general rule . . . appellate courts only have jurisdiction over appeals taken from a final order.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check