7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Cosby.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Cosby Anchor | green | “remains free to undertake its own assessment of the facts in relation to the issues,” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Clay | green | “it cannot be something that was obtained illegally, such as statements from unlawfully arrested codefendants,” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Clay | green | “police act with an improper purpose when they arrest persons as part of an expedition in the hope of developing probable cause” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Bew | green | “an opportunity to develop a factual record” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Jackson | green | “it cannot be something that was obtained illegally, such as statements from unlawfully arrested codefendants,” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Jackson | green | “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Jackson | green | “the inordinate length" of defendant's 50-hour detention "weighs against attenuation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.