4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Solano, R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Solano, R. Anchor | green | “as this test is conjunctive, failure to establish one prong obviates the need to analyze the remaining ones.” | 16 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Pagan | green | “demonstrate that the evidence: (1) could not have been obtained prior to the conclusion of the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence; (2) is not merely corroborative or cumulative; (3) will not be used solely to impeach the credibility of a witness; and (4) would likely …” | 5 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Pagan | green | “(1) could not have been obtained prior to the conclusion of the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence; (2) is not merely corroborative or cumulative; (3) will not be used solely to impeach the credibility of a witness; and (4) would likely result in a different verdict i…” | 3 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Pagan | green | “likely result in a different verdict if a new trial were granted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.