Topic: courts have applied the familiar mcdonnell douglas burden-s… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #14827

8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lopez v. Webster Central School District.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Lopez v. Webster Central School District Anchor
nywd · 2010
green “courts have applied the familiar mcdonnell douglas burden-shifting analysis to cases arising under title vi.” 5
2 Sosa v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. & Marcy Berger
nyed · 2019
green “the elements of a prima facie case may be used as a prism to shed light upon the plausibility of the claim.” 4
3 Jenkins v. Arcade Building Maintenance
nysd · 1999
green “fact-specific allegations of a causal link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's race are required.” 3
4 Jenkins v. Arcade Building Maintenance
nysd · 1999
green “the essential elements of the claim are actions that were racially motivated and purposefully discriminatory.” 3
5 Henry v. NYC Health & Hospital Corp.
nysd · 2014
green “allegations of discriminatory comments directed at the plaintiff's racial group are a recognized method of establishing discriminatory intent” 3
6 J.E. ex rel. Edwards v. Center Moriches Union Free School District
nyed · 2012
green “an invidious discriminatory purpose may often be inferred from the totality of the relevant facts . . . .” 3
7 Jordan v. Forfeiture Support Associates
nyed · 2013
green “good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff's failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond her control.” 3
8 De La Peña v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
nyed · 2013
green “without any further facts, defendant's statements, while politically incorrect, do not raise a plausible inference that his actions towards the plaintiffs were a result of their membership in a protected class.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check