3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Lanagan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Lanagan Anchor | green | “vague, unsubstantiated allegations of the affidavit are insufficient on their face for a finding of bias or prejudice” | 14 |
| 2 | In re Disqualification of Baronzzi | green | “generally, an affiant is required to submit evidence beyond the affidavit of disqualification supporting the allegations contained therein.” | 10 |
| 3 | In re Disqualification of Baronzzi | green | “required to submit evidence beyond the affidavit of disqualification supporting the allegations contained therein.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.