4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re N.R.S..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re N.R.S. Anchor | green | “r.c. 2151.414 outlines the procedures that protect the interests of parents and children in a permanent custody proceeding.” | 11 |
| 2 | In re Y.W. | green | “r.c. 2151.414(b)(1) establishes a two-part test for courts to apply when determining whether to grant a motion for permanent custody: (1) the trial court must find that one of the circumstances in r.c. 2151.414(b)(1)(a)- (e) applies, and (2) the trial court must find that perman…” | 7 |
| 3 | In re K.M.S. | green | “if the trial court determines that any provision enumerated in r.c. 2151.414(b)(1) applies,' it must proceed to the second prong of the test, which requires the trial court to 'determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether granting the agency permanent custody of the chil…” | 5 |
| 4 | In re K.M.S. | green | “under r.c. 2151.414(d)(1), the trial court is required to consider all relevant factors listed in that subdivision, as well as any other relevant factors.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.