3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rink v. Cheminova, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rink v. Cheminova, Inc. Anchor | green | “under rule 702 and daubert, district courts must act as 'gate keepers' which admit expert testimony only if it is both reliable and relevant.” | 13 |
| 2 | Umana-Fowler v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. | green | “merely telling the jury what result to reach is unhelpful and inappropriate.” | 7 |
| 3 | Umana-Fowler v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. | green | “an expert may testify as to his opinions on an ultimate issue of fact . . . he 'may not testify as to his opinion regarding ultimate legal conclusions.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.