4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from 70 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 625, 32 fed.r.serv.3d 867 Robin Floyd Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 625, 32 fed.r.serv.3d 867 Robin Floyd Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A. Anchor | green | “untimeliness in itself can be a sufficient reason to deny leave to amend, particularly when the movant provides no adequate explanation for the delay.” | 15 |
| 2 | Gary D. Patton, Cross-Appellant v. Albert E. Guyer, Martha Frances Guyer, Howard Fisher, D/B/A Fisher's I.G.A., Cross-Appellees | green | “courts typically find prejudice only when the amendment unfairly affects the defendants 'in terms of preparing their defense to the amendment.” | 5 |
| 3 | Hayes v. Whitman | green | “salvage a lost case by untimely suggestion of new theories of recovery.” | 3 |
| 4 | Tosco Corporation v. Koch Industries | green | “no lapse of time can legalize a public nuisance amounting to an actual obstruction of public right.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.