7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-Appellant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-Appellant Anchor | green | “falsity through concealment exists where disclosure of the concealed information is required by a statute, government regulation, or form.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene Chesser | green | “incredible as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Landis Cuber Dothard | green | “intent to deceive by making a false or fraudulent statement.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Armando Balbino Ramos, Evaristo Ramos | green | “based upon comments of the trial judge unless the comments are so prejudicial as to amount to denial of a fair trial,” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Charlotte Stephens Ethridge, Champ Drew Ethridge | green | “we have held that 1001 convictions challenged on sufficiency of the evidence grounds can be affirmed based on a finding that a jury reasonably could infer from circumstantial evidence that the defendants acted knowingly and willfully,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Keyvee Jones | green | “fails to renew his motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of all of the evidence,” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira Jackson | green | “the issue of whether a law is void for vagueness is a question of law for the court to determine,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.