4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 150 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maxcess, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maxcess, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Anchor | green | “document outside the four corners of the complaint may still be considered if it is central to the plaintiff's claims and is undisputed in terms of authenticity.” | 67 |
| 2 | Axa Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLC | green | “on a motion to dismiss, the complaint is construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and all facts alleged by the non-moving party are accepted as true.” | 58 |
| 3 | Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc. | green | “by contrast, a factual attack on a complaint challenges the existence of subject matter jurisdiction using material extrinsic from the pleadings, such as affidavits or testimony.” | 20 |
| 4 | Wilchombe v. TeeVee Toons, Inc. | green | “a court may consider only the complaint itself and any documents referred to in the complaint which are central to the claims.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.