5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Arango.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Arango Anchor | green | “a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 9 |
| 2 | Avalos v. Baca | green | “must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” | 6 |
| 3 | National Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. Harris | green | “showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support the fact.” | 4 |
| 4 | Jim Maxwell v. County of San Diego | green | “should be granted 'if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 5 | Jim Maxwell v. County of San Diego | green | “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.