3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar Anchor | green | “drastic remedy that a court should grant only in extraordinary circumstances in response to an act amounting to a judicial usurpation of power.” | 13 |
| 2 | In Re: Austen O. Nwanze | green | “given its drastic nature, a writ of mandamus should not be issued where relief may be obtained through an ordinary appeal” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.