4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fengchu Chang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fengchu Chang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “supported by objective evidence that persecution is a reasonable possibility.” | 11 |
| 2 | Fengchu Chang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “a subjective fear of persecution that is supported by objective evidence that persecution is a reasonable possibility.” | 7 |
| 3 | Ellyana Sukwanputra Yulius Sukwanputra v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General United States of America | green | “there is a pattern or practice in his or her country of nationality ... of persecution of a group of persons similarly situated to the applicant on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” | 5 |
| 4 | Fengchu Chang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “he has a subjective fear of persecution that is supported by objective evidence that persecution is a reasonable possibility.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.