7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Davis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Davis Anchor | green | “the government's officers had stayed within the law.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Wolfe | green | “the police intimidated or coerced defendant in any way” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Sargent | green | “obtained under the pressure of police action that became available to police only by the prior unauthorized conduct” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Tucker | green | “by a preponderance of the evidence the validity of the search.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Johnson | green | “entirely independent of, and was not obtained by exploitation of, the previous illegality.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Johnson | green | “the presumption of regularity of the warrant is undermined and the burden of proof fairly may be shifted to the government to show that the evidence is not tainted by the misconduct.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Kennedy | green | “evidence gained from a consent search during or after alleged police illegality is to be suppressed only if it is found that the consent was gained by exploitation of the illegality or that defendant's free will was tainted by the illegal police conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.