3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Aguas Lenders Recovery Group LLC v. Suez, S.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aguas Lenders Recovery Group LLC v. Suez, S.A. Anchor | green | “the fact a party is a non-signatory to an agreement is insufficient, standing alone, to preclude enforcement of a forum selection clause.” | 12 |
| 2 | Magi XXI, Inc. v. Stato della Città del Vaticano | green | “a non-signatory to a contract containing a forum selection clause may enforce the forum selection clause against a signatory when the non-signatory is 'closely related' to another signatory.” | 9 |
| 3 | Magi XXI, Inc. v. Stato della Città del Vaticano | green | “we hold that a non-signatory to a contract containing a forum selection clause may enforce the forum selection clause against a signatory when the non-signatory is 'closely related' to another signatory.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.