5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Dyess.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Dyess Anchor | green | “undermine confidence in the outcome.” | 7 |
| 2 | State v. AH | green | “while the action is fresh; in the heat of action.” | 5 |
| 3 | Wold v. State | green | “on whether the error 'undermines confidence in the outcome,” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Dyess | green | “concluded that the test of prejudice as formulated in strickland subsumes the various statements of the harmless error test that this court has used over the years.” | 5 |
| 5 | Wold v. State | green | “on whether the error undermines confidence in the outcome,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.