2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wood v. Safeway, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood v. Safeway, Inc. Anchor | green | “the substantive law controls which factual disputes are material and will preclude summary judgment; other factual disputes are irrelevant.” | 21 |
| 2 | Golden v. Tomiyasu | green | “proof of some element of fraud, unfairness, or oppression as accounts for and brings about the inadequacy of price.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.