7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Scully v. Fitzgerald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scully v. Fitzgerald Anchor | green | “the dangers that might follow when a lit cigarette is thrown into a pile of papers or other flammable material,” | 4 |
| 2 | Dare v. Freefall Adventures, Inc. | green | “applying pertinent skydiving guidelines,” | 4 |
| 3 | Fantini v. Alexander | green | “conduct of those teaching karate,” | 4 |
| 4 | Sanzari v. Rosenfeld | green | “the responsibilities and functions of real-estate brokers with respect to open-house tours,” | 4 |
| 5 | Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mendola | green | “applying pertinent skydiving guidelines,” | 4 |
| 6 | Giantonnio v. Taccard | green | “a layperson's common knowledge is sufficient to permit a jury to find that the duty of care has been breached without the aid of an expert's opinion.” | 3 |
| 7 | Klimko v. Rose | green | “risk involved in a chiropractor repeating the further neck adjustments” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.