3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of Steven.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of Steven Anchor | green | “the grant or denial of a motion for 'an adjournment for any purpose is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court” | 20 |
| 2 | G.-K., SOPHIA M., MTR. OF | green | “failed to demonstrate that the need for the adjournment to arrange transportation was not based on a lack of due diligence on her part” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Ella B. | green | “held that a defendant may not use the right to counsel of choice 'as a means to delay judicial proceedings . . . ' thus, appellate courts must recognize 'a trial court's wide latitude in balancing the right to counsel of choice against the needs of fairness and against the deman…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.