3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. Titus.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. Titus Anchor | green | “under the american rule, applicable in pennsylvania, a litigant cannot recover counsel fees from an adverse party unless there is express statutory authorization, a clear agreement of the parties, or some other established exception.” | 15 |
| 2 | Profit Wize Marketing v. Wiest | green | “a party in whose favor a judgment is rendered, regardless of the amount of damages awarded.” | 6 |
| 3 | Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. Titus | green | “a litigant cannot recover counsel fees from an adverse party unless there is express statutory authorization, a clear agreement of the parties, or some other established exception.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.