7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P. Anchor | green | “we have little quibble with the economic argument that the price of a merger that results from a robust market check, against the back drop of a rich information base and a welcoming environment for potential buyers, is probative of the company's fair value.” | 6 |
| 2 | Taylor v. Diamond State Port Corp. | green | “in our constitutional system, this court's role is to interpret the statutory language that the general assembly actually adopts, even if unclear and explain what we ascertain to be the legislative intent without rewriting the statute to fit a particular policy position.” | 5 |
| 3 | Maniscalco v. State | green | “the court will deny a motion for reargument that does no more than restate a party's prior arguments.” | 3 |
| 4 | Maniscalco v. State | green | “the superior tribunal simply referred to the ecmh to criticize the court of chancery's reliance on information that the supreme court deemed was known to the market as a reason for not giving substantial weight to the deal price.” | 3 |
| 5 | DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P. | green | “may well feel tempted to turn its valuation decisions into a more improvisational variation of the old delaware block method, but one in which the court takes every valuation method put in the record, gives each equal weight, and then divides by the number of them.” | 3 |
| 6 | Dell, Inc. v. Magnetar Global Event Driven Master Fund Ltd. | green | “the actual facts concerning dell's market values-the particularities of its stock market and the sale process-demonstrate that the court of chancery's reasons for assigning no weight to the market values are flawed.” | 3 |
| 7 | Caspian Alpha Long Credit Fund, L.P. v. GS Mezzanine Partners 2006, L.P. | green | “efficient working of capital markets.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.