4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Heilman v. Waldron.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heilman v. Waldron Anchor | green | “relevance is construed broadly at the discovery stage.” | 13 |
| 2 | Dale Stroud v. Southwestern Energy Company | green | “has very wide discretion in handling pretrial discovery.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dale Stroud v. Southwestern Energy Company | green | “very wide discretion in handling pretrial discovery.” | 5 |
| 4 | Heilman v. Waldron | green | “the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outw…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.