2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. O'Hara.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. O'Hara Anchor | green | “we look to the asserted claim and assess whether, if correct, it implicates a constitutional interest as compared to another form of trial error.” | 14 |
| 2 | State v. Kirkman | green | “plausible showing by the appellant that the asserted error had practical and identifiable consequences in the trial of the case.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.