2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Siegel v. HSBC N. Am. Holdings, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Siegel v. HSBC N. Am. Holdings, Inc. Anchor | green | “accept all of the complaint's factual allegations as true and draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.” | 16 |
| 2 | Giunta v. Dingman | green | “not bound to accept conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.