3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Com. v. Richards, J..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Com. v. Richards, J. Anchor | green | “ard will constitute a prior offense for purposes of sentencing on a second or subsequent dui conviction . . ., and a defendant is presumed to be aware of the relevant statute.” | 11 |
| 2 | Com. v. Moroz, R. | green | “the trial court erred in sentencing the appellee as a first-time dui offender without considering his acceptance of ard for a prior dui” | 10 |
| 3 | Com. v. Richards, J. | green | “the portion of section 3806(a), which equates prior acceptance of ard to a prior conviction for purposes of imposing a section 3804 mandatory minimum sentence, passes constitutional muster.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.