6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hobbs v. IGF Insurance Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hobbs v. IGF Insurance Co. Anchor | green | “louisiana courts have consistently held that compulsory arbitration clauses in contracts of insurance are unenforceable under this statute because they operate to deprive louisiana courts of jurisdiction of the action against the insurer.” | 6 |
| 2 | Safety Nat. Cas. v. Cert. Under., Lloyd's, London | green | “recognize an agreement in writing under which the parties undertake to submit to arbitration' their dispute 'concerning a subject matter capable of settlement by arbitration.” | 5 |
| 3 | Doucet v. Dental Health Plans Mgmt. Corp. | green | “classification of the contract at issue as an insurance contract renders the arbitration provisions of that contract unenforceable under r.s. 22:629.” | 4 |
| 4 | Turner v. Leslie | green | “if jurisdictional requirements are met, courts throughout the state have the legal power and authority to hear the case; however, not all courts with jurisdiction are in the proper venue.” | 4 |
| 5 | Turner v. Leslie | green | “where the parties have contracted for a particular forum or venue for litigating disputes, this does not mean they have deprived the courts of this state of the legal authority to hear the dispute (i.e., the jurisdiction).” | 3 |
| 6 | State ex rel. Cunningham v. Board of Assessors | neutral | “the terse and admirable maxim of the civil law, 'contemporanea expositio est fortissima in lege,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.