Topic: only the most blatant remarks, whose intent could mean noth… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #15619

2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc. Anchor
ca11 · 2004
green “only the most blatant remarks, whose intent could mean nothing other than to discriminate on the basis of some impermissible factor constitute direct evidence of discrimination.” 18
2 Jimenez v. Wellstar Health System
ca11 · 2010
green “has routinely and systematically grouped title vii and 1981 claims for analytic purposes.” 7

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check