6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Beilke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Beilke Anchor | green | “intentional conduct which the actor may not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Jose Efrain Ibarra Cantellano | green | “a warrant of deportation does not implicate adversarial concerns in the same way or to the same degree as testimonial evidence,” | 4 |
| 3 | Alfredo Efren Hernandez-Uribe v. United States | green | “the rule of collateral estoppel in criminal cases is not to be applied with the hypertechnical and archaic approach of a 19th century pleading book, but with realism and rationality,” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Esteban Bahena-Cardenas | green | “because it is not made in anticipation of litigation, and because it is simply a routine, objective cataloging of an unambiguous factual matter.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Francis E. Springfield | green | “comes within the intent, if not the precise wording of 924(c)(3),” | 3 |
| 6 | Rodolfo Bejarano-Urrutia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “encompasses both active commissions and passive omissions,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.